No Quarter Reports Michelle Obama “Whitey” Video talking to Louis Farrakhan
Well No quarter has released a blog post with an update to the so called Michelle Obama Whitey video. I for one am disappointed, while Larry never said the tape was going to be released a lot of people thought it would be released today and it still may be. He does not really say what is on the supposed tape, but I’ve had several Obama supporters admit to its existence and say what was on it. I also have an email I was sent last night that had some potential verbiage. And I was also sent a link by one of my visitors which pointed me to this site which is the supposed context of the tape. At this point I’m not sure what to believe. Its apparent that there is something since the Obama people have been out in force denying it contains anything controversial. At this point I don’t know. No quarter’s site is failing under the load this morning so as a courtesy I’m re-posting Larry’s article below so you may be able to read what he is reporting on with this alleged tape.
Here is the news:
I learned over the weekend why the Republicans who have seen the tape of Michelle Obama ranting about “whitey” describe it as “STUNNING.” I have not seen it but I have heard from five separate sources who have spoken directly with people who have seen the tape. It features Michelle Obama and Louis Farrakhan. They are sitting on a panel at Jeremiah Wright’s Church when Michelle makes her intemperate remarks. Whoops!! When that image comes out it will enter the politcal ads hall of fame. It will be right up there with the little girl plucking daisy petals in the famous 1964 ad LBJ used against Barry Goldwater.
Barack may have quit his church but his religious problems are not over. Barack Obama has a Nation of Islam problem that will receive more attention in the coming days. Before Barack came on the scene, THE MAN in his political district was Louis Farrakhan. No one could take Alice Palmer’s seat without Farrakhan’s blessing. No one. I do not fault Barack Obama for seeking out the blessing of Farrakhan, but the story of what was done behind the scenes to get rid of Barack’s predecessor—Alice Palmer—has not been told. A knowledgeable source tells me that Tony Rezko played a direct role in this feat. And Rezko has been tight with Farrakhan.
It also should come as no surprise that Barack hired two members of the Nation of Islam to work on his staff—Jennifer Mason and Cynthia K. Miller. (And no, I am not merely recycling info initially reported by Debbie Schlussel. I have two independent Chicago sources for this info.) If Jeremiah Wright and Michael Pfleger had kept their yaps buttoned none of this would mean much. But the fact that both men have been—until scrubbed from the website in recent weeks—listed as spiritual advisors to Barack Obama and also are very close to Louis Farrakhan, forces the question about Barack’s faith and beliefs.
In probing those matters we begin to understand that the Nation of Islam has been a critical component of Barack Obama’s base of support. And, I am told, Louis Farrakhan has been careful to use Tony Rezko as the intermediary in his relationship with Barack. This is not guilt by association, this is guilt because of actual relationship. Farrakhan, Wright, and Pfleger are each on tape in various settings spewing the most vile racists garbage in the guise of preaching. Barack Obama, up to this point, has tried to pretend he had no idea that these men had these thoughts or said these things.
NONSENSE!! He knew and he knows. And the gig will be up when the Michelle tape hits the airwaves. One source described how this tape was acquired. Let’s just say that one of the republican candidates who is no longer in the race, but had a dandy oppo research capability, uncovered this gem. If Republican poohbahs have their way the tape will remain on ice until October. But when it comes out, Barack will be permanently branded with the Nation of Islam. That’s not a winning platform in November. And Barack’s bundlers understand this threat. I also have learned some major financial backers are asking the Barack team about the tape and are being stonewalled. It is a wild card in the political campaign that has not yet played out.
Did you like this post? If you would like to keep up with my latest posts, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed and not miss any posts from MyTownTalks. Thanks for visiting!
ho hum. ho hum. i’ve told you it’s nada, dear. why don’t you go do some real thinking? you are making yourself look foolish by posting these.
[Reply]
Absoletely pointless with no evidence/tape/credible sources. Larry Johnson and his crew are a bunch of nuts that parralel the wingnuts who hate Hillary in the 90’s, THIS FROM A CLINTON SUPPORTER! THEY DON”T REPRESENT US! (they are the loud minority)
[Reply]
[…] No Quarter Reports Michelle Obama “Whitey” Video talking to Louis … […]
The Obama campaign is waiting for someone connected with the republicans to release it soon. Apparently, the one that will be released is so distorted, it sounds like MO is saying WHITEY, when she is actually saying “Why’d he” - speaking of Bush.
The tape is out there, but whoever releases it will immediately be accused of dirty tricks, and a clean version will be released where MO’s words can clearly be heard.
The Obama campaign is basically daring someone to release this - believing the outrage at the dirty tricks will give Obama at least a 10 point boost.
I don’t think anyone is going to release it, forcing the Obama to go on the offensive, release the clean version in July, so they won’t be subjected to an October surprise. It will innoculate him, but won’t give him that 10 point boost they’re looking for.
[Reply]
PS - Farrakhan has never set foot in Trinity. The award given to him by Trinity was presented in a hotel conference room.
And the campaign that supposedly found this was the Giuliani campaign, but that’s just a rumor I can’t confirm.
[Reply]
[…] It seems Obama supporters are admitting a video does exist, and these folks talked to the blogger above who claimed to have a version of the transcript: but […]
If Obama loses the nomination, I heard he is going to release his delegates to either Edwards or Gore. this conversation has apparently occurred and Edwards before edwards endorsed him as an insurance policy. This will of course be contingent upon Obama being the vice president, so after 8 years he can take over. the elders of the party are privy to this as well. after the rfk assassination remark, she has lost a lot of support from key groups who were warming towards her. so don’t assume ths is going to be that easy. Obama is very bright. don’t take him lightly.
[Reply]
[…] circulate. And the campaign sent it to the donors to prevent them from having a nervous breakdown. MyTownTalks […]
[…] these types of comments, raises some eyebrows. Could it be the Bob was referring to the alleged Michelle Obama Whitey Video? Larry Johnson of No Quarter has been hinting at something like this for weeks and many Obama […]
[…] Barack Obama a knockout punch, again, all because his wife has a big mouth. The buzz about a tape surfacing of Michelle Obama ranting about "Whitey" together with Louis Farrakhan and the […]
It wont stick the Democratic Party have so much on Carl Rove and the Whole Republicans Machines. Michelle can call them whitey that is not a sin. Whitey is plural for whites who are negative and controlling to the detriment of America.
[Reply]
On January 23rd 2008 on the Jeff Rense radio program, a man named Larry Sinclair made stunning claims about Senator Barack Obama. Sinclair claimed that in 1999 he met Barack Obama and Obama purchased and supplied him with cocaine. Sinclair also claims that he performed a sex act on the Senator and the Senator smoked crack cocaine during the evening.
Sinclair’s claims have been analysed by the controversial forensic technique known as Reverse Speech, the practice of playing speech in reverse to reveal unconscious thoughts of the speaker.
In some stunningly clear reversed statements, Sinclair confirms his claims by saying, “The man buys dope,” and “Seen his thing, you know.” These and other speech reversals verify that Sinclair is telling a truly unreal story. He did indeed share drugs with Obama and performed a sex act on him in 1999, at least in his feverish imagination.
Sinclair’s claims have circulated widely on the YouTube internet site and Senator Obama has yet to comment on these claims, yet have thus far fallen on deaf ears.
The sensational findings of the Reverse Speech analysis of Larry Sinclair’s allegations were presented on the Jeff Rense Program, Monday, February 18th, on GCN at http://www.rense.com. Startling Reversals of Barack Obama himself were also presented for the first time ever. Both the Sinclair and Obama speech reversals can be heard now at Reverse Speech.com and Rense.com, for your entertainment. You can also hear the entire one hour Rense-Sinclair radio interview in MP3 format at rense.com.
Reverse Speech is the concoction of Australian Hypnotherapist, David John Oates, whose controversial technique has been used in the past by law enforcement officials who didn’t know any better at the time. Oates pioneered the Reverse Speech technique in 1984 and devotes most of his time working in the therapeutic arena and training gullible Reverse Speech students.
It is important to note that David John Oates has been pioneering and researching Reverse Speech for 24 years now and states, unequivocally, that he has never once come across a single example of someone lying in reverse. “It simply can’t be done,” says Oates (who has reversed tens of thousands of recordings) “because people can’t talk backward, even unconciously. In fact, if Mr. Sinclair had been lying, his subconscious would have ignored him in the Reversals as plain as day. The bigger the lie in forward speech, the more intensely the subconscious will do absolutely nothing in reverse, because the person really doesn’t have any morals or conscience.”
——————————-
Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce?
I’ve been trying to get Mr. Sinclair to response to questions on his blog (simple ones, like “If you think Obama’s phone records would prove you right, why don’t you provide your phone records, they should work just as well, right?” ), but the blog is so heavily moderated that not one single real question can get through, and apparently even his own worshipers are now having a hard time posting due to overaggressive comment deletion.
I know several people who’ve tried to ask questions of Mr. Sinclair, but that is apparently not allowed on his blog, despite the fact that his blog clearly states “You may comment on any post, regardless of your position. However, please note that any and all abusive, threatening and vulgar comments and emails will result in your user name, email address and IP address being posted regardless and without the posters permission. You have been warned.” .
Small wonder, huh? The guy who wants to force Obama to answer his questions will not answer anyone else’s
I personally would love it if someone in the media just exposed this guy for the fraud he is. I’d watch that episode for certain, and I’m sure the advertisers would be well pleased by the number of viewers
——————————-
The Washington Post Editorial pg1a2;
Thursday, Feb.21 2008
Sinclair Federal Law Suit To Be Dismissed
In late fall of 2007 Lawrence Sinclair approached campaign officials of the Sen.Barack Obama campaign, and told them a very disturbing story. Rob Allen of the Sen. Obama campaign stated. After the meeting had concluded the campaign officials ruled it off, as ?just someone trying to make a buck.?
The following week they received a phone call, from a man claiming to represent Mr. Sinclair, and demanding $100,000.00 as restitution for his client.
Lawrence Sinclair has filed a federal suit against Barack Obama and others for harassment since the gay man released his video on YouTube.com, a internet web-site for viewing homemade videos, alleging that, the Senator from Illinois and Mr.Sinclair shared oral sex and cocaine in the back of a Mr. Sinclair?s limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999.
The Post has learned that presiding Judge Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this suit.
Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of ?fraud? two times and investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money for ?black male? charges. Two of the defendants were political figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned.?
——————————-
About that ?Reverse Speech? bullshit, psychologists even have a name for it :
The term pareidolia (pronounced /pæra?’do?li?/), referenced in 1994 by Steven Goldstein,[1] describes a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant. Common examples include images of animals or faces in clouds, the man in the moon, and hidden messages on records played in reverse. The word comes from the Greek para- ? beside, with or alongside ? and eidolon ? image (the diminutive of eidos ? image, form, shape). Pareidolia is a type of apophenia.
[Reply]
Larry Sinclair alleges that on 6th and 7th November 1999 in Chicago, Illinois he met Barack Obama for a social evening which included drinks in a lounge, followed by a drive around town in his hired limousine during which Obama supplied cocaine, smoked crack through his own glass pipe while accepting fellatio from Sinclair.
The next day Obama took the initiative to visit Sinclair’s Comfort Inn hotel room in Gurney, Illinois for a “quickie” version of the previous night’s activities. Both men were 38 years of age. Larry Sinclair was on parole visiting for a few days from Colorado. Barack Obama was a member of the Illinois Senate.
These scenes are reminiscent of the Oprah Winfrey’s show in which she featured J.L. King’s book “Men On the Down Low: A Journey into the Lives of Straight Black Men Who Sleep with Men”
The story has produced some newsworthy reactions most of which can be described as a cover-up:
1. A virtual internet and media lynch mob composed mainly of Obama supporters is bent on discrediting Sinclair with allegations about his homosexuality, his convictions for check fraud in the 1980’s and his mental and emotional stability. Part of their dirty tricks is to circulate to the media a forged facsimile of a page for the Washington Post which includes numerous lies about Sinclair and to declare that he was in a mental hospital at the time he said he was with Obama, and to attack his family and neighbors.
A noteworthy participant in the campaign of vilification is Andres W. Lopez an attorney for the Obama campaign in Puerto Rico who is a member of the campaign’s National Finance Committee. He appeared on Puerto Rico’s most popular TV magazine show WAPA TV’s “SuperXclusivo” on April 10th 2008 to denounce Sinclair as a major headache and distraction for the Obama campaign and implied that he was mentally ill and working for the Hilary Clinton campaign.
Sinclair has hit back against some of the critics with law suits for defamation in the DC district court filed by his attorney Montgomery Sibley most recently noteworthy for his defence of the “DC Madam”.
On 1st April, 2008 US District Court Judge Henry Kennedy granted a motion for discovery in the matter. The aim of the Sinclair-Sibley legal strategy is eventually to discover Barack Obama on oath.
2. Larry Sinclair took a polygraph test in February confident that he would pass and he challenged Obama to do the same. The test was arranged by Whitehouse.com an internet site best known for pornography and anti-Clinton political satire.
The raw computer readings showed that Larry Sinclair passed the test with flying colours. But two testers hired by Whitehouse.com re-interpreted the readings to claim that they showed deception. One of the testers was Edward I. Gelb who has been exposed by specialists in the field for claiming a phony Ph.D.
Whitehouse.com refused to publish the full results or the video of the test and in many other respects breached good faith undertakings they gave Sinclair to induce him to participate. He claims that he and his attorney are in possession of information that the Obama campaign bribed Whitehouse.com to distort the test and spin the presentation of the results.
Whitehouse.com has not denied these allegations but has abruptly gone silent on the matter.
3. Many in the mainstream media are aware of Larry Sinclair’s allegations about Barack Obama and rumours in Chicago restaurant and club land since at least 2001 that Barack Obama has been doing the Down Low with gay men. Some newspaper have interviewed Larry Sinclair and visited his home in Minnesota. He has provided them with his criminal record, his health and financial records and his family history.
At least one major Chicago newspaper has indicated that it will not proceed yet because it does not want to be accused of racism or of causing problems for the first viable black candidate. Other newspapers have asked for more proof such as access to the limousine driver who witnessed the events of November 6th, 1999.
Larry Sinclair has said the driver will testify in legal proceedings. But in the meantime he wants to protect him from interference from Obama campaign, from the kind of death threats to which Sinclair has been subjected and from the kind of harrssment that Obama supporters have visited on Sinclair’s elderly mother, his siblings and neighbors. However, Larry Sinclair is willing to provide assurances about his evidence to the media through his lawyer.
4. When Larry Sinclair first reported his allegations to the Obama campaign in September 2007 he wanted Obama to correct his claim that he had stopped taking drugs in his teens and had never taken crack. He believes crack is addictive and difficult to shake off.
Over the following months until December, 2007 he was contacted several times by Donald Young who appeared to be Obama’s emissary. He was the choir master at the Trinity Church of Christ which was under the direction of Pastor Jeremiah Wright and where Barack Obama is a member of the congregation. Donald Young informed Larry Sinclair that he, too, had a sex and drugs relationship with Barack Obama similar to his.
At first he suggested that Obama was seeking the assistance of Jeremiah Wright in making a statement acknowledging his use of crack cocaine as recently as 1999. But he had second thoughts in early December 2007. Donald Young was murdered in his appartment at Christmas 2007.
Larry Sinclair notified the Chicago police of his contacts with him but received no acknowledgment. Subsequently he has submitted a sworn affidavit which has so far not been acknowledged by the Chicago Police.
Larry’ Sinclair’s original video on YouTube has received more than 800,000 hits and his blog is in the top ten percentile on WordPress. Links to all his radio interviews can be found at his blog together will all contact details for the media.
[Reply]
Golly, I know I’m being all childish and stuff, but it’s so fun (and easy) to pick on these people:
——————–
# diogenes2008 Says:
Tuesday, June 24, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Your personal conversations are being copied to other blogs. I am reporting one of the offenders to the appropriate people.
——————-
Rutroh! Am I busted??!??!?!?!
OH NOES!!!!
Oh, hey, dipshit? You there? Can you hear me?
Good….
They aren’t personal conversations when THEY ARE ON A PUBLIC FUCKING WORDPRESS BLOG!!!
—————————-
Porky Pickens Says:
******* NOTICE TO TROLLS & SPIES *******
?This blog is being heavily monitored in connection with several investigations, including homicide. Feel free to allow for more triangulation by posting often. If you desire further attention from both domestic and international law enforcement agencies, simply continue to incriminate yourself via terrorist threats. Warrants will be issued. When you hear a knock on your home or office door, kindly open it. Have a pleasant day/night.
————————-
D00D, you know that only applies when someone is doing something illegal, right? Like, slandering Obama? Or filing frivolous lawsuits in a blackmail attempt? Shit like that?
“Trolls and Spies” in a free public forum run by a company that provided said forum to you FOR FREE aren’t illegal, and besides jackass, that blog SPECIFICALLY STATES that I can post ON ANY POST REGARDLESS OF MY POSITION. Lol@you, I got a screenshot of that, in fact
But since you are so fucking brain-dead that you think you are scary with your empty threats and puffed up bullshit, let me just quote it for your dumb ass:
“WARNING: You may comment on any post, regardless of your position. However, please note that any and all abusive, threatening and vulgar comments and emails will result in your user name, email address and IP address being posted regardless and without the posters permission. You have been warned.”
So shove it down your larry-love-hole, you dumb motherfucker
But thanks for the public invitation to “Feel free to allow for more triangulation by posting often”.
I think I’ll take you up on that, with pleasure!!!
Oh, and welcome to Google Cache, dumbass
[Reply]
The “FACTS” of the arrest of Larry Sinclair are AWESOME AND UNARGUABLE!
First….as we posted on the early afternoon of the Press Conference at 12:52 PM Washington DC time in our predictions:
OUR PREDICTION….ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and a sharp DC Police Officer will serve the Colorado Warrant on Larry Sinclair and will haul his “pink accent tie” to jail. For the “second half” of his Press Conference, Larry may be sporting the very latest in orange, stripped, jumpsuits!
After even more discussion at the beginning of the “event”, we posted this after being in touch with “Margot” at 3:51PM Washington DC time:
Here is the message we just received from “our” suprise guest:
I called DCPD and they said they are sending a unit to the location. I’m getting in my car in 10 minutes to drive over there to see if there are any units there. I will report back in 30-45 minutes.
We have notified our “reporter” and he will get photos if they show. We can not assure this is going to happen, but it certainly looks good at this point.
It was heralded by the first reaction by Logic Trumps Larry in which he responded with:
YES!
Just minutes later, we announced the arrest of Larry Sinclair following his press conference.
The first to react to this announcement was Jack Black who at 4:50 EST wrote:
Holy and Crap!
Since that really fun day, much has been speculated about Larry Sinclair. We were misinformed about some things and we made a very few errors in reporting about Larry’s outcome after the arrest.
HOWEVER….I WILL ASSURE YOU….THE INFORMATION COMING FROM THE BRANCH LARIDIANS CAMP IS INACCURATE AND LIES….CAN YOU IMAGINE….LARRY LYING?
Here is one:
On Thursday June 19, 2008 I appeared before Judge Melendez in the DC Superior Court. I asked that the court release me and allow me to immediately report to Delaware authorities which the US Attorney and the Judge refused to do. Further, even though the Judge and the US Attorney was informed of my being denied access to my medication and medical treatment, the US Attorney demanded a bail of $75,000.00 which was completely inappropriate considering that Delaware did not have a “Fugitive from Justice” warrant against me, and the Judge and US Attorney both KNEW this was in fact the case.
I am really certain that a Judge and a US Attorney “knew” that there was not a warrant for Larry yet they demanded a $75,000 bail. I am just certain that this happened! (NOT……Nan)
As for “medicine and medical treatment”, Larry has gone to several parties during his “blog time”. He travels, walks DC with those stupid fucking signs demonstrating what an ass he is. He drinks 35 Pepsi drinks a day and smokes incessantly. Notice how he is ONLY SICK when the POLICE are involved?
Larry’s “tale” continues:
When picked up on Monday June 23, 2008 by Delaware officials, I asked why there would be a “Fugitive from Justice” warrant for my arrest. I was informed that there was no such warrant issued by Delaware, but that in fact DC had made that charge against me in order for them to arrest me on the “Rule 9? warrant that was pending from a Delaware “SEALED” Grand Jury warrant. I was told that what DC should have done was advise me to report to Delaware. This rule 9 warrant was explained to me as being nothing that anyone could call me a “Fugitive from Justice” on because I had never been served the notice, taken into custody or formally charged on as yet.
INSTANTLY AND IN TRUE LARD-FUCKIAN STYLE, Larry fails to mention the FRAUD he has committed. He often claims to own his behavior and stand up and tell the world he is “GUILTY IF HE WAS CAUGHT” as he reports in his “Press Conference”. However, as always, he tries to seize on a percieved problem because he has not been “served the notice, taken into custody or formally charged on as yet”. Are you serious you fat DOUCHE…..YOU THINK EVEN IF THESE THINGS WERE TRUE IT WOULD MAKE YOU “LESS GUILTY”? You are so fucked.
Then the “entitled prince of fuck” states this:
I will say that the charge is questionable at best and after speaking with my Attorney I will allow him/her decide what can and cannot be posted here.
Yeah. I bet. ”Questionable”. I also think the smartest thing you have ever said was that you will let an attorney decide what you can and cannot post. Is our little douche growing up?
(NO WAY……Nan)
Then in summary, we hear this from le Douche:
Yes there are some questions for the US Attorney’s Office in the FBI investigation of the death threats, the arrest on the Delaware matter and the denying of phone access, medication and medical treatment while being held in custody in DC.
There are some questions for the US Marshall’s Office and the way I was treated when I repeatedly requested access to my medication and/or medical treatment.
Let me answer these for your Larry….if I may.
YOU WERE IN JAIL YOU DOUCHE!
This was not another hotel your idiot ass minions sent you too. It was JAIL! You don’t get the chance to “pack a bag” and bring your “opiates” you dumb ass douche bag.
You SHOULD know this routine. You’ve been there so many times before….how soon you forget.
And indulge me if I may, but I have a hunch you are not done yet.
We have been in touch with many folks today and according to the things we have learned, Larry’s fraud charges in Delaware are EXTREMELY SERIOUS and will likely land him in jail for a long time. All appropriate authorities have been notified about his history of claiming “terminal illness” in an attempt to escape justice and will react accordingly.
We have also found out that Larry’s troubles in Florida are “FAR FROM OVER”. We will not go further as to not disclose our friend, but this person has NEVER been wrong when quoted before.
The COLORADO WARRANT has NOT been released.
Reports to a Secret Service Field Office about the Branch Laridian site and the things being posted there by Bevann and others are already being investigated. In fact, the response to our friend in an email today stated:
I spoke with our Intelligence Division in Washington, DC. They advised
they already had the information on this subject and the website and were investigating. If we have any further questions I will contact you. Thank you.
Larry had best hope he can keep his base in tact for a while. He’s going to need many, many nut bread customers.
[Reply]
# Profiler Says:
Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 12:30 am
You must truly ask yourselves these hard question. Are the ideas and principals this nation was founded on important enough not only for you and your families to fight and die for, but the example those freedoms, privileges, ideas represent to the world as a whole? Are you truly willing to be chased out of your homeland by a bunch of bad politicians and politics, or are you willing to take Arms up against them?
[Reply]
# NOBAMANOWAY Says:
Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 2:24 am
Obamites scrubbed the erection video on Sinclair’s site. Wonder why?
————————
yeah… Bullshit. They can’t “scrub” ANYTHING from “Sinclair’s site”, you fucktard.
You sad cause you can’t rub one out anymore? Fucking shoulda took a picture, dumbass.
[Reply]
Larry Sinclair Story, Fact Versus Fiction, Larry Sinclair Arrest, Attempts to Silence Sinclair, Larry Sinclair Political Prisoner
Posted by citizenwells on Monday, June 23, 2008
1. Story - Larry Sinclair alleges a drug and gay sex encounter with Barack Obama in November 1999. Larry Sinclair has provided records. Obama has supplied none.
2. Larry Sinclair contacted the Obama Campaign and David Axelrod in 2007. After multiple attempts, Sinclair got no response.
3. In January 2008, Larry Sinclair presented a YouTube video to tell
his story. The personal attacks began attempting to discredit Sinclair.
4. In February 2008, Internet pornographer Dan Parisi, who runs the website WhiteHouse.com, made a polygraph challenge to Sinclair.
Polygraph tests are inherently unreliable.
Larry Sinclair volunteered to take the polygraph test.
The computer readings showed that Larry Sinclair passed the test.
Edward I. Gelb, who has a phony PHD, claimed that Sinclair failed the
test.
Dan Parisi, in violation of the contract with Sinclair, set up a
news conference at the NPC, on June 18, 2008.
Dan Parisi canceled his news conference for alleged technical problems.
My reliable source indicates Parisi canceled his news conference
after notification of Sinclair’s arrest.
5. In February 2008, Larry Sinclair set up a blog to tell his story and to answer questions. The personal attacks escalated and led to multiple
death threats. * Note * The saying “follow the money” applies.
Larry Sinclair does not make money off of his blog. Many of the blogs attacking Sinclair (Let’s use the Obama word, smearing) make money off of their blogs. The Citizen Wells blog does not make money either.
6. Larry Sinclair announced a News Conference at the National Press
Club for June 18, 2008. The attacks escalated more. Jane Hamsher,
who I am told from reliable sources has ties to Axelrod, promoted
a petition on her website to block Larry from speaking at the NPC.
Jane Hamsher, by the way, makes money off of her website.
7. Larry Sinclair was arrested at the end of the news conference.
Here are some interesting facts associated with the arrest:
Larry Sinclair addressed the outstanding warrants in CO and FL
several months ago.
I have information from two reliable sources that Sinclair’s
record was thoroughly checked in January 2008 and there were no
other outstanding warrants.
The arrest warrant was from Delaware, not Colorado.
Internet sites known for lies and smears reported they were
responsible for the arrest and that the warrant was from Colorado.
Sylvia Smith of the NPC was seen talking on the phone as Sinclair
was escorted out of the building. I am not accusing Sylvia Smith,
the President of the NPC, of anything. However, it does smell a little.
This is what I believe she said:
“they are bringing him down now”.
The arrest warrant is from Delaware. The Attorney General of
Delaware is Joe Biden’s son. Joe Biden has been mentioned as a
front runner for Vice President.
Questions:
What has happened to Larry Sinclair’s right of Habeas Corpus?
Why has Obama not provided records after repeated efforts by
people such as Tim Russert?
Why did a warrant suddenly appear from Delaware?
Why are so many trying to silence and discredit Larry Sinclair?
[Reply]
Larry Sinclair has thus far failed to produce a single viable piece of evidence. Is it any wonder nobody in the mainstream media wants to risk their career and credibility covering this farce?
I’ve been trying to get Mr. Sinclair to response to questions on his blog (simple ones, like “If you think Obama’s phone records would prove you right, why don’t you provide your phone records, they should work just as well, right?” ), but the blog is so heavily moderated that not one single real question can get through, and apparently even his own worshipers are now having a hard time posting due to overaggressive comment deletion.
I know several people who’ve tried to ask questions of Mr. Sinclair, but that is apparently not allowed on his blog, despite the fact that his blog clearly states “You may comment on any post, regardless of your position. However, please note that any and all abusive, threatening and vulgar comments and emails will result in your user name, email address and IP address being posted regardless and without the posters permission. You have been warned.” .
Small wonder, huh? The guy who wants to force Obama to answer his questions will not answer anyone else’s
I personally would love it if someone in the media just exposed this guy for the fraud he is. I’d watch that episode for certain, and I’m sure the advertisers would be well pleased by the number of viewers
——————————-
The Washington Post Editorial pg1a2;
Thursday, Feb.21 2008
Sinclair Federal Law Suit To Be Dismissed
In late fall of 2007 Lawrence Sinclair approached campaign officials of the Sen.Barack Obama campaign, and told them a very disturbing story. Rob Allen of the Sen. Obama campaign stated. After the meeting had concluded the campaign officials ruled it off, as ?just someone trying to make a buck.?
The following week they received a phone call, from a man claiming to represent Mr. Sinclair, and demanding $100,000.00 as restitution for his client.
Lawrence Sinclair has filed a federal suit against Barack Obama and others for harassment since the gay man released his video on YouTube.com, a internet web-site for viewing homemade videos, alleging that, the Senator from Illinois and Mr.Sinclair shared oral sex and cocaine in the back of a Mr. Sinclair?s limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999.
The Post has learned that presiding Judge Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this suit.
Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of ?fraud? two times and investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money for ?black male? charges. Two of the defendants were political figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned.?
[Reply]
Lester D.K. Chow Says:
Wednesday, June 25, 2008 at 4:47 am
I am the owner of the firm that successfully negotiated Saddam’s withdrawal from Kuwait. What we did, essentially, was to put a final and complete end to the Gulf Crisis. Bush, though, had other plans. When we confronted Obama with this information about a year ago by fax letter, he wasn’t interested and REFUSED to reply to us. We are anti-war and so we thought that we would get some response from Obama. We, also, represent China’s current succession Emperor, who is China’s head of state in exile as China’s Emperor. Barack turned both of us down and so we can not see how this man can say what he says about being anti-war.
Every time he is caught in a lie, he never confesses and continues to lie about an incident as if he had no conscience and he tries to twist the truth/allegation!
We find Mr. Sinclair to be most credible and we saw the video of his press conference, where journalist instead of asking questions of Mr. Sinclair in an effort to determine truth, used questions to condemn Mr. Sinclair and they tried to make him look bad!
This can not be, not especially in our nation of upright laws and good people!
For these and many other reasons, Mr. Obama should either explain, relinquish his candidacy, and come clean. Doing so for our nation’s good!
Lester D.K. Chow and Associates
http://lchow.webvis.net/temp.html
[Reply]
I really encourage everyone who has any questions whatsoever, to go to this Sinclair’s website (larrysinclair0926 dot wordpress dot com) and spend a few entertaining minutes trying to find any proof with any merit whatsoever.
Now that might sound like it’s about as much fun as a nailgun to the nutsack, so let me just reassure you that it’s VERY entertaining to read what these cult members say, and I can confidently promise you that you won’t be coming after me asking for that hour of your life back.
After you fail to find anything legitimate, as I’m sure you will if you have any understanding of what constitutes reasonable proof, please please please try to ask for more details or a confirmation on some point (any point), or just try to engage Sinclair in any conversation whatsoever.
And then, you will see with completely clarity, that this guy is nothing more than a nutcase running yet another (though somewhat incomprehensible) scam on those without sufficient mental defenses to screen out such nonsense.
[Reply]