Michelle Obama Whitey transcript
Well this is total rumor and I have no idea if this is accurate or not, but I was sent an email with part of the alleged speech of the reported Michelle Obama words where she mentioned Whitey. Take this at face value and I have no data what so ever if this is accurate or not, but since there has been so many comments on this topic then I will share what I was sent. Normally I would ignore this content, but since I’ve seen several Obama supporters on this site and other sites tell part of the exact phrase it may have some merit. You can make up your own mind. Me I’m still waiting for the entire tape before I make up my mind on what this really means.
Reported verbiage from Michelle Obama’s tape
“Once again, the white man keeps us down, what’s up with Whitey, Why’d he attack Iraq, Why’d he let Katrina happen, Why’d he leave millions of children behind. This is the legacy the white man gives us”
Did you like this post? If you would like to keep up with my latest posts, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed and not miss any posts from MyTownTalks. Thanks for visiting!
Well, here you go:
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/6/1/235757/2325
There’s your big deal. I’m glad that’s over. Could you do me a favor and go tell all your friends over on the other blogs? They’re still being jerked around by Johnson and the Republican Party. You seem to be one of the first to figure out it’s hogwash. You’re still welcome to come learn more about Senator Obama’s policies and join the campaign against McSame.
[Reply]
ObongoCanDoAnything reply on July 1st, 2008 5:44 pm:
It would not matter for 98% of the African American race if Obongo and his wife dropped ten hits of LSD and did a dance on your Thanksgiving and then took a poop on it. You would still make excuses for Obongo and his wife’s behavior.
Nothing they do matters to 98% AA’s, nothing. Cause’ they are Black.
Same with the ‘White Guilters’ group. It would not matter if Obongo and his wife pooped on a your dinner, you would still eat it. And it would be OK cause’ your wimps.
[Reply]
Scott Smith reply on July 27th, 2008 6:35 pm:
Comment removed by admin for racial comment.
[Reply]
Marie, I’ll still wait for the actual tape before I make up my mind. What is on that site is not exactly the same as what I received in an email that I posted in this post.
Hoefully this is all it is because I would hate to see a potential first lady say such hateful things.
As far as your offer to join Obama, then I’m sorry that is not going to happen. I don’t think the guy is ready to be president so I won’t be voting for him. I have not heard any valid argument which would make me change my mind on this at this point.
[Reply]
[…] This is pure rumor: Reported verbiage from Michelle Obama’s tape […]
DEAR SIR
YOUR NAME BEEN FORWARDED TO ME BY MY COUSIN BARACK OBAMA AS SOMEONE WHO IS TRUSTWORTHY AND CAPABLE OF HANDLING A TRANSACTION OF GREAT SUM OF CASH. I THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF NIGERIA AND WILLING TO OFFER YOU A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THIS CONSIDERABLE SUM RETURN FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE IN MOVING IT OUT OF MY WAR-TORN COUNTRY.
It’s probably not a good idea to believe every single thing you read in e-mails, especially when we don’t actually know who it’s from.
By the way, did you know Barack Obama is a Muslim? E-mails told me so.
[Reply]
[…] several Obama supporters admit to its existence and say what was on it. I also have an email I was sent last night that had some potential verbiage. And I was also sent a link by one of my visitors which pointed me to this site which is the […]
Yes and that was why I said it was a rumor and I had no actual data about whether it was the truth or not. I also allowed the comments pointing to a link tht says the coments contain another phrase and not what was in the email. We’ll just need to see what happens when if ever the tape is made public.
[Reply]
Gosh, I think the quote you post is really damaging. Michelle is basically saying that a white person (or people) is responsible for society’s problems. No way to spin that, folks, it’s just racist. And if she is sitting next to Farrakhan when saying this…yikes! Double the trouble.
[Reply]
This is a smear whisper campaign and you should be ashamed for participating in it. There is no tape. It’s ridiculous.
[Reply]
@Wendy, As I’ve said numerous times I’m don’t know if there is a tape or not, but what I do find interesting is that I’ve had several Obama spporters telling me the tape has nothing on it that is damaging. Please see http://www.mytowntalks.com/news/no-quarter-reports-michelle-obama-whitey-video-talking-to-louis-farrakhan.php where I posted links that where left to blogs stating what was actually on the tape. So either there is not a videio or there isd one that says nothing. If there is one that says noting why don’t the Obama people just release it so everyone can see what it actually says and shutdown these ruors. I will be one he first ones to post a retraction if the tape comes out and says what the Obama supporters has says it does, but until I hear it I’m waiting for the goods and I’ll continue to post about both sides of this controversy.
[Reply]
Helene reply on June 18th, 2008 5:31 pm:
Because you are totally desperate to have McCain win the election, you will stoop to nothing. Well, I have news for you. No one cares about your rumors and smears. Get used to it morons.
[Reply]
bob reply on July 2nd, 2008 3:59 am:
yet you care enough to reply.
[Reply]
No, you forget–the proof of existence is on your boy Larry and yourself. We don’t need to do anything. As far as your response to my first post: so you think McCain would make a better president? I’d tell you to go do some research at the Senate record, look up their voting histories, go find credible sources on Obama’s policies…but I have a feeling you’re not into research that much. Looks like you like having your news fed to you. If you get some energy, go look up some facts.
[Reply]
[…] here is the alleged transcript of the tape Michelle, to be taken with a grain of salt. “Once again, […]
[…] two very close variations on the tape’s content come out of the liberal blogosphere? The supposed “whitey” quote allegedly said by Michelle Obama: Reported verbiage from Michelle Obama?s […]
My God… It’s crystal clear to me now. Whitey is GWB’s nickname! I don’t know why she calls him that though, because his hair is not really that white, more grey than white I would say.
[Reply]
What? You people are acting like this is no big deal? If that’s all there is, that’s bad enough. Good grief. What’s wrong with you people?
[Reply]
FORCEFIELD reply on June 3rd, 2008 8:45 pm:
It’s not a big deal because no one has yet to unearth the actual video. For now it’s a baseless claim.
[Reply]
I dont think this is so innocent. She calls Bush Whitey which is not acceptable coupled with the mean country, not proud remarks and have any of you read her papers from Princeton? Anyway, another bad part of these comments are that they match Rev Wright and Phlegers words tone and maybe the worst is that this is racially devise “This is the legacy the white man (them) leaves us, (blacks). This is not the unity rhetoic of Barack, but points to the black/white divide so many of his other close associates and “road map” advisors preach. I have heard the comments were made as she sits next to Farrakhan on a panel and they were perhaps speaking to a group or congregation. Obama is going to need Hillary and Bill, clear patriots who are loved or respected by all colors of centrist and democrats. Especially, blue color, Hispanics and baby boomer women all huge groups.
[Reply]
FORCEFIELD reply on June 3rd, 2008 8:44 pm:
It’s innocent if it never happened. For the time being the burden of proof is on Larry Johnson, who says a tape exists but no one has ever seen it.
[Reply]
Helene reply on June 18th, 2008 5:33 pm:
For your informatiom Bill Clinton supported Farrakhan for the Million Men March in DC and actually praised him. So did Sen. Rendell who actually sat with Farrakhan at a conference. Obama never supported Farrakhan, that is a fact.
[Reply]
You guys are grasping at straws. ok so there is a tape and she is railing against the white man and I too feel as a person from another minority group have railed against the white man. I am telling you- this is DANGEROUS BUSINESS. Obama has won this with delegates and in every metric possible, including her mythical popular vote meme. so if you take this away from him, yes there will be hell to pay not only among the dems but even extend to the repub for pushing this. this is so utterly ridiculous that he wins the right way and she cannot but since she is entitled to she must. what was wrong with waht father ppfleger said. you are proving his point. do you think there is nothing against mccain? oh my freinds the stuff they have against cindy mccain will make michelle look like a baby. as for HRC she is a crook. she and her husband are corrupt, white trailer trash., you guys and hannity are truly giving your white race a bad name. cannot let a black man win huh? well the repubs will never have the AA vote and the women with a brain vote. The HRC folks will have only the old biddies vote. so if it is between HRC or mccain well take your pick, grandma or grandpa. sorry I will take the “racist” black man over those two whitey trailer trash.
[Reply]
HRC and bill are not patriots gayle, they are criminals. go do some research. the right wingers you are hangign around with now have 1200 pages of oppopsition research on HRC. they have a racist church and rezko on Obama. Obama pales in comparison to the shady characters thos 2 hang out with. The right wing is supporting hillary onlyBECAUSE SHE IS A WHITEY. PERIOD. THINK WITH YOUR HEAD. HISPANICS DON’T VOTE LIKE AA’S DO. WOMEN LIKE ME WHO HAVE MORE THAN 4 DEGREES AND MAKE A 100,000 DOLLARS WONT VOTE FOR HRC. THE BLUE COLLAR VOTE WILL GO TO MCCAIN. THIS IS A SET-UP. THE RIGHT WING WANTS HILLARY SO THEY CAN KEEP IT WITHIN THE WHITE RACE. No we will not let OBAMA fall no matter what. as for all of those women who are supporting HRC, they are all going to have primary challenges. So go on bring the tape and be screwed like dan rather was. you think the dems are going to allow this to happen. also if fox news pulls this out and sean is involved they will have no more credibiltiy left. They will go down as the whitey new org. I am sick of this racism perpetuated by the clintons and the whiteys at the rnc. mccain and his wife’s trun will come. take it to the bank.
[Reply]
I heard from a very reliable source that Barack will give his delegates to either edwards or gore if he has to quit. so don’t get too excited over the whitey thing. it wont help you one bit. eat from what there is on your plate.
[Reply]
[…] Town Talks has a more extensive version of the transcript: Once again, the white man keeps us down, what’s up with Whitey, Why’d he attack Iraq, […]
[…] Reference source MyTownTalks […]
@Palmoll — Well with these three posts and the other one you made to make your point and not a single paragraph seperation does not say a lot for those 4 degrees you claim to have . Perhaps you should not count the diploma mill papers in that number.
[Reply]
[…] Michelle Obama Whitey transcript Jump to Comments thanks to sister rossetta for leadhttp://www.mytowntalks.com/politics/michelle-obama-whitey-transcript.php […]
Hmmm? If they are willing to release a transcript from the campaign of this MO rant, why not the actual tape? Apparently it DOES EXIST so rather than assume that the transcript is factual why not just let us see the tape and make up our own minds? I think it’s quite obvious. The transcript is NOT exactly what she said but watered down. Do they really think we buy this crap? Geesh!!!
[Reply]
given the fact Barack Hussien Obama is a racist POS himself i have not doubt his loving wife shares the same anti american pro-terrorist beliefs as the messiah BHO….
a vote for BHO is a vote for marxism and must be dealt with accordingly
[Reply]
Tape or no tape. Obama has dug a nice big hole for himself to fall into.
Buh Bye bastard. You can’t win with 90% African Americans
and neocon liberals.
[Reply]
Obama Explains National Anthem Stance Is this guy crazy or what! On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:48:04 -0400, “LT. Bill Ginn” USAF ret forwarded: Hot on the heels of his explanation for why he no longer wears a flag pin, presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama was forced to explain why he doesn’t follow protocol when the National Anthem is played. According to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171…… During rendition of the national anthem when the flag is displayed, all present except those in uniform are expected to stand at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. “As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides,” Obama said.”There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression. And the anthem itself conveys a war like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all. It should be swapped for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song ‘I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing.’ If that were our anthem, then I might salute it.”
[Reply]
FORCEFIELD reply on June 3rd, 2008 8:42 pm:
DEBUNKED:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/stance.asp
[Reply]
This really does look desperate beyond anybody’s wildest dreams. During this campaign I have been for Biden and then Hillary but after reading what fellow supporters have tried to do with this, to race-bait and setback race relations to pre-1950 levels, I can no longer support her candidacy.
For all the vile lies Hillary went through while in the whitehouse for her supporters to do this is beyond belief. I always thought Obama was too naive, but I think this incident has shown me that really that many people really are too dark, twisted and cynical. I may vote for Obama or McCain in November, but I sure as hell wouldn’t vote for Hillary. This is not the kind of America I want to live in.
[Reply]
[…] MyTownTalks’ email: […]
palmoll-
“WOMEN LIKE ME WHO HAVE MORE THAN 4 DEGREES”
Let’s see, that would be Womyn’s studies, African American Anti-American studies, Gaia as Goddess and Role Model and 5th Degree of Separation Socialism as a Goal. Ph.D’s in all I imagine. Maybe there was a misunderstanding-you don’t have more than 4 degrees-you belong to the fifth column!
You don’t seriously expect anyone to believe your drivel do you? You’re a bigot. You have nothing to be a bigot about according to your own posting, you seem to have done all right for yourself and yet you remain a bigot.
Affirmative action-it just don’t work.
[Reply]
Of course she does. You can find diploma mills all over the net. You know send us $2000 dollars and we will send you a degree for your life experiences no course study required. Time spent in Trinity should quailfiy as a degree in something. Maybe a BS in Hate
[Reply]
AlexAsher - you are mad at Hillary because Obama is a racist? That’s pretty funny.
[Reply]
Technically, Obama is a Muslim. An apostate Muslim. Born to a Muslim father, which is all it takes by their standards, went to school in Indonesia where school registrations listed him as Muslim at age six. Even learned a little Arabic. His half-sister says he sometimes attended Friday prayers with his step-father.
Now, I don’t think he was ever a practicing or believing Muslim. I think he is an atheist. TUCC and claims of Christianity were a convenient way to gain political credibility.
Anyway, just being born Muslim is enough, according to Muslims, to make one a Muslim, and as an apostate Muslim, he risks a fatwa, although that doesn’t seem too likely.
[Reply]
David Richardson reply on June 3rd, 2008 6:07 pm:
So by your logic, McCain’s adopted daughter is a Muslim…
The biggest shame and tragedy of it all is now Americans look at the everyone who is a Muslim as an enemy…
I am NOT proud of my country with such sentiment.
[Reply]
FORCEFIELD reply on June 3rd, 2008 8:46 pm:
I agree, David. The prejudice and speculation are deplorable and embarrassing.
[Reply]
Michelle reply on June 9th, 2008 8:27 pm:
That was not what Ed stated.
He said that according to —Islam— he was a muslim and either still is, or is an apostate.
Your reading comprehension is embarrassing.
[Reply]
Obama didn’t say those things about the American Flag. Do your research before reposting email forwards.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/stance.asp
[Reply]
[…] stupid people in America today may just be Michelle Obama, who is rumored to have used the word “whitey” in a racist diatribe at her former church while flanked by the wonderful Reverend Wright and the […]
If a tape ever surfaces and if the supposed transcript is close to correct, it should be easy to tell if Michelle Obama says “Whitey” or “Why’d he.”
She might say “Why’d he leave,” but not “Whitey leave.”
She might say “Why’d he attack,” but not “Whitey attack.”
So (if there is a tape), does it say “Whitey LEFT” or “Why’d he LEAVE”?
Does it say “Whitey attackED” or “Why’d he attack”?
\\, ““Once again, the white man keeps us down, what’s up with Whitey, Why’d he attack Iraq, Why’d he let Katrina happen, Why’d he leave millions of children behind. This is the legacy the white man gives us”
[Reply]
Morris O'Kelly reply on June 6th, 2008 5:45 pm:
Let’s be real…”Whitey” is a 1970’s term. If the alleged tape were from 1973 and the Vietnam War was raging, then it’s a bit more plausible.
But c’mon…no tape, no proof.
A “transcript” of no discernible origin is not “proof.”
A real “transcript” has names, date location and other participants listed accordingly. Who is Michelle allegedly talking to?
This video was supposedly of a WIDELY attended event and NOBODY except a few Republican operatives has the tape (including Trinity congregants)?
Common sense says…(BUZZER)
[Reply]
Maybe Michelle is saying “why’d he” in each case, instead of “whitey”. But if she closes with “this is the legacy of the white man”, clearly she means “whitey”, not “Bush the white man”.
[Reply]
The flap regarding Obama not holding his hand over his heart hasn’t been completely debunked, as Forcefield stated above. Here’s a link, also from Snopes, that shows him standing with his hands over his crotch during the National Anthem.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/anthem.asp
It’s a video that shows him standing there with his hands by his nuts while the other democrat candidates hold their hands over their hearts.
[Reply]
Nov 2008-
michelle: whitey didn’t elect my husband…
[Reply]
[…] The Obama supporoters have claimed that the video contained nothing but a couple of days ago I received an email which said the video contained several racists remarks against white people in the Trinity church, but considering some of the other stuff that has been […]
if these supposed comments were made in 2004, how can Michelle possibly be commenting on Katrina? It didn’t happen until August of 2005. THis is all a load of bull.
[Reply]
If this tape is real, it will not likely come out until October when the democrats have a definitive candidate.
[Reply]
How many of you have read her college thesis? Having read a very large portion of it myself it didn’t take long for me to see she has some serious animosity toward white America. For me it was when she described her experience at college and it making her aware of her “blackness” and need to serve the black community above all else. Look it up read and you will see that these allegations although unproven might have legs. Read the thesis its a eye opener to Michelle Obama. Had she known she would marry a potential president I can assure you the thesis would not have been written the way it was.
[Reply]
This is what she supposedly said:
“Once again, the white man keeps us down. What’s up with Whitey, Why’d he attack Iraq, Why’d he let Katrina happen, Why’d he leave millions of children behind. This is the legacy the white man gives us.”
I can totally see how she most likely said “why’d he” in several of her sentences. BUT, there is no doubt that the first two sentences: “Once again, the WHITE man keeps us down. What’s up with WHITEY?” were meant to say WHITE and WHITEY. Otherwise they don’t make sense. Meaning, who says “Once again, the WHY”D HE man keeps us down.” and “What’s up with WHY’D HE?” Neither make any sense! So, she MUST have at least said WHITEY in that one sentence and WHITE in the other. And, saying it once is bad enough.
God forbid someone said, when referring to Obama, “What’s up with that n*gger?” All hell would break loose and the person who said it would be called racist. But, because Mrs. Obama may have only said it ONCE in her paragraph, that’s ok. It’s okay because he didn’t say it throughout the entire paragraph? Give me a break. Saying it once or 4 times is the same.
[Reply]
McCain makes racist slur against Asian people.”I hate the gooks,I will hate them as long as I live.” Asian Americans, many of whom find the the term offensive and inappropriate for an elected official. “The use of a racist slur can’t be acceptable for any national leader, regardless of his background,” said Diane Chin, executive director of the Chinese for Affirmative Action. McCain said “Gook is the kindest appellation I can give.”
[Reply]
To those of you who say that Michelle Obama said, “Why’d he” and NOT “whitey”. There is a way to tell. First of all, here is a 7th grade definition of the basic sentence types for those of you who might not know, or who might have forgotten.
Provide an explanation and give examples of the 4 types of sentences:
declarative: statement of fact without strong emotion and ends with a period;
I am a male.
Bill threw the ball.
interrogatory: asks a question and end with a question mark;
What time will you be home?
Did you feed the dog?
“WHY’D HE DO THAT”??? (uses an upward, quizzical inflection of the voice)
imperative: make a command or request and end with a period;
No talking until everyone finishes the assignment.
Pass the ketchup, please.
exclamatory: communicates a high level of excitement or emotion and ends in an exclamation point;
She hit me for no reason!
I hate you!
“WHITEY STARTED THE WAR!!!!” (does not have an upward, quizzical inflection of the voice)
I’m sure that most of us can hear someone utter a sentence and determine if someone is asking a question or communicating a high level of excitement. I know that I can. So if there is a tape, bring it on! And, as they say, the proof is in the pudding. Isn’t that right? And if she is making an exclamatory statement then, OBAMA IS GONE!!!!
1. To those of you who say that Michelle Obama said, “Why’d he” and NOT “whitey”. There is a way to tell. First of all, here is a 7th grade definition of the basic sentence types for those of you who might not know, or who might have forgotten.
Provide an explanation and give examples of the 4 types of sentences:
declarative: statement of fact without strong emotion and ends with a period;
I am a male.
Bill threw the ball.
interrogatory: asks a question and end with a question mark;
What time will you be home?
Did you feed the dog?
“WHY’D HE DO THAT”??? (uses an upward, quizzical inflection of the voice)
imperative: make a command or request and end with a period;
No talking until everyone finishes the assignment.
Pass the ketchup, please.
exclamatory: communicates a high level of excitement or emotion and ends in an exclamation point;
She hit me for no reason!
I hate you!
“WHITEY STARTED THE WAR!!!!” (does not have an upward, quizzical inflection of the voice)
I’m sure that most of us can hear someone utter a sentence and determine if someone is asking a question or communicating a high level of excitement. I know that I can. So if there is a tape, bring it on! And, as they say, the proof is in the pudding. Isn’t that right? And if she is making an exclamatory statement then, OBAMA IS GONE!!!!
[Reply]
But McCain can openly spew racist slurs in public and the media doesn’t even give it the time of day when the man looks set to go head to head with Hillary for the White House and possibly become the President for over 12 million Asian-Americans, or “gooks” as McCain calls them.
Double standards? That hardly covers it. The corporate media are once again protecting their war candidate, Mr. “bomb bomb bomb Iran”, Mr. “stay in Iraq for 100 years” while crucifying Paul for comments made by other people that pale in comparison to McCain’s personal vitriol about his deep-seated hatred of “gooks”.
[Reply]
Ooops,
But McCain can openly spew racist slurs in public and the media doesn’t even give it the time of day when the man looks set to go head to head with Obama for the White House and possibly become the President for over 12 million Asian-Americans, or “gooks” as McCain calls them.
[Reply]
deapp you do understand that he was talking specifically about the men who tortured him right? Have you ever read anything about the interview? He was asked how he felt towards the men that beat him within an inch of his life not asian people in general. The gook comment is specific to a handful of people that mistreated him during his years as POW. I would have some choice names for them as well be he doesn’t hate Asian people and he doesn’t think all Asian people are gooks.
How would you describe someone who beat you daily broke your arm? What would like him to say?
[Reply]
Steven, is it OK for a man that was beaten and left for dead by two white boys on the side of the road and then taken to jail by two white cops for bleeding on the sidewalk, to call his attackers white peck-a-woods, crackers or f-in honkies after many years has passed? I would think you would give me a resounding, NO! And that’s not the end of this poor man’s story.
The government treated him worst and gave him a dishonorable discharge after white countrymen (not the enemy) sh-t in his bed and shoes daily (a lot more). Enough to make you crack, wouldn’t you say. Well he did. But on his dying bed he forgave those white people for what they did to him for being Black. I can not agree with all of Rev. Wright’s statements but by your own admission Wright’s anger is justified because of the racist times he experienced. But even Rev. Wright came short of calling white people racist names.
I would not have picked the man that got beaten by white boys (my Uncle) to be President of the USA because of his mental condition nor would I Rev. Wright and certainly not McCain.
[Reply]
deapp what i am saying is that for the black man who was beaten on the streets or for the POW that was beaten in Vietnam to have hate for the individual people who commited the acts is understandable. The POW and the black man that was beaten have worn shoes that me and you never have. Who are we to judge their personal feelings to situations we weren’t involved in?
I could understand Wrights animosity towards anyone who personally wronged him but he blames all whites and thats not right. For you to say McCain hates all Asians because he called his torturers gooks is far fetched and simply a liberal talking point. Research the differences between McCains interview and the relentless onslaught of Wrights anti-white and anti-USA rhetoric.
[Reply]
Steven, all I’m saying is that no one of any color that can not work out their past demons, let him/her be the giver or receiver (whites toward African Americans, Vietnamese solders toward American solders or American solders against Aldergrove prisoners) should not become President of this country made up of multi-racial/cultural groups period. There are people who vindicated themselves from their past such as Ex-Klansman Robert Byrd of racist West Virginia or Alabama past Governor George Wallace. These men were forgiven yet, not fully trusted.
Only in recent months has McCain started to apologize for voting against the Voting Rights Amendment and MLK’s Birthday. In the past instead of celebrating MLK birthday with many Americans, he choose to support George Wallace Jr. who is a member of the Neo Racist Conservative group, Council of Conservative Citizens. (see HateWatch.com). I could easily hate white people for what I have experienced and what I saw my family go through at the hands of whites in Mississippi but I will rise above my haters in that regard and not return the favor. McCain is not fit to be President of the United States of America. We do not need anyone with Vietnam flash backs waking up in the middle of the night screaming “GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKS” and pushing that damn red button.
[Reply]
WryToast reply on June 9th, 2008 6:59 pm:
I read your McCain comment and thought you might enjoy this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfC5BRobLkU
WryToast
[Reply]
To this discussion I contribute a video. The first part of it deals with the so-called racially charged term “Whitey.” The video is called “Whom Among Whitey Will Vote for Obama?”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkJ_cWnCeHg
When finished, please return to My Town Talks and continue reading.
Thank you!
WryToast
[Reply]
Great God man, you are the first Caucasian that I have truly had the honor to grammatically converse with over the WiFi that has revalatorical insight in what is truely going on here. There are some whites that do not find the term whitey an insult. If many had to choose between whitey and nigger…..guess which one they would choose? WHITEY! Hell, I might go for that one myself. It absolutely has no real negative historical emotional connotations behind it.I believe it was created by whites anyway. It’s been said that the racist vote runs around 15% of the white voting population. That’s enough to defeat Obama. Well, we have made history, now we have to wait two generations to enjoy the reality. Good job on the video.
The Racist Vote/Published Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:01 PM by Christopher Beam
Email jcbeam@gmail.com
Yesterday Politico’s Roger Simon wondered how much of the vote Obama would lose by virtue of his race alone. Simon cites an AP poll in which eight percent of voters said they would not vote for a black man, but guesses that figure is low—it’s really the number of people who admit they’re racist. He ballparks the number at around 15 percent.
Tonight’s exit polls provide a lens, however blurry, through which to view the racist vote. CNN asked voters whether the race of the candidates was important to them. Twenty percent of voters said “yes,” and of that group 59 percent broke for Clinton. Meanwhile, voters who said “no” split between Clinton and Obama 50-50. So if you set aside the group that considers race important, the candidates tie.
To zoom in a little, CNN also breaks down the voters by race. Of the whites who said that race is important to them, 75 percent broke for Clinton. Keep in mind this group is pretty small—only 13 percent of voters overall. But think about it: If you’re white, you tell pollsters that race helped determine who you voted for, and you vote for the white candidate, it’s not a particularly huge stretch to conclude that you’re a racist. (The corollary, of course–and this is where the argument gets messy–is that black voters who said they voted for Obama because of race are also racist. CNN doesn’t have numbers on this.)
For a while now, more Clinton voters have said they would not vote for Barack Obama in the general than Obama voters said they would not vote for Clinton. (Last month, a national poll showed that one in four Clinton voters would vote for McCain if Obama won, whereas one in five Obama voters would do the same if Clinton won.) It’s impossible to quantify exactly how much of that disparity you can chalk up to racism—especially given that many of the people Obama may have alienated in non-racial ways (the “bitter” comment, for example) happen to be white. But I wouldn’t be surprised if it contributes.
Published Tuesday, April 22, 2008 10:01 PM by Christopher Beam
Email jcbeam@gmail.com
[Reply]
Admin, this is how you plan to get McCain in? By making up stuff.
What’s next Obama’s barber is Al-Qaeda!
I understand that scaring people away from Obama is your last resort seeing that the McCain cannot win on his own merit. However, people aren’t stupid and might be insulted for you underestimating their intelligence.
[Reply]
Actually Morris if you will read the post you will see that I was sent this in an email and I stated it was total rumor and I had no idea if it was true or not. But the rumor is out there and and any information on the subject is worth a blog post.
[Reply]
The truth about Michelle
Lie:
On May 30th, Rush Limbaugh said he had heard a rumor that a tape exists of Michelle Obama using the word “Whitey” from the pulpit of Trinity United Church of Christ.
Truth:
No such tape exists. Michelle Obama has not spoken from the pulpit at Trinity and has not used that word.
Lie:
Blogger Larry Johnson wrote on May 31st that he would add “New and dramatic developments. This is a heads up. I’ll post the news Monday morning by 0900 hours. Now I know why people who have seen the videotape say it is stunning. Barack’s headaches are only starting.”
Truth:
Johnson posted no such update.
Lie:
Proven GOP sleazemeister Roger Stone said on Fox News on June 1st that “there’s a buzz, which I believe now to be credible, that some indelible record exists” of a tape of Michelle Obama using the term “whitey.”
Truth:
Stone conceded on June 2nd that he hasn’t met anyone who has seen the tape and that it therefore may be a hoax.
Lie:
“The Michelle Obama Rant Tape was filmed between June 26th - July 1st 2004 in Chicago, IL at the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition Conference at Trinity United Church: specifically the Women’s Event.”
Truth:
Michelle Obama was not on a panel, and the Rainbow Push Conference was at the Sheraton.
FOR A COPY OF THE CONFERENCE SCHEDULE: http://web.archive.org/web/20040811233750/corona.tpsgi.com/rpc/Conference_Schedule.htm
[Reply]
I’d much rather elect “McSame” than “Snowbama” … as in “snowjob”. It’s laughable and at the same time pathetic how many Americans have bought into this empty suit. With the Obamabots, it’s a matter of religion now, not simple politics. They blitely ignore the mountain evidence that their Annointed One is anything less than the Second Coming of Jesus himself. But fortunately, they’re a minority of the population.
Although it wouldn’t surprise me at all if I’m wrong, I personally think that the Michelle Obama “whitey” video does exist. For one thing, there’s too much smoke here for there not to be at least some fire. But in addition to that, I have no problem at all believing that Michelle Obama would say these kinds of things after getting all ramped up in front of a raucous congregation at UTCC. The only question for me is whether or not somebody actually captured it on video.
But Obama is going to lose this election regardless of whether the tape comes out or not. Why? Because as time passes, more & more Americans are going to take off the rose-colored glasses and see him for what he really is: a far left neophyte who would be in WAY over his head as president. He really would be the 2nd coming of Jimmy Carter. ***shudder*** A majority of the independent voters who will decide this election will, at the end of the day, decide to play it safe and vote for John McCain.
[Reply]
Oh, and “Deapp”, you’re a complete f***ing idiot.
I don’t like Ann Coulter at all, but she definitely has it right when she says “Debating with a liberal is like debating with a 5-year old.” You are proof positive of that statement.
[Reply]
DannyJerk,
Wow, you must be “F***ING” desperate to quote Ann Coulter.
Grab your balls and settle down. If you can’t find them then grab Ann Coulter’s balls, they’re probably bigger than yours.
[Reply]
Deaap if the tape does exist and is aired on some news channel and its her saying bad things like is reported what are you going to do? Do you intend on supporting Obama regardless?
[Reply]
Steven, good to hear from you. Answer to your question is…..If-If-If Bier Rabbit was caught with Buzz Bunny doing the Back-Door-Santa in the carat patch would you still allow your kids to watch Buzz on TV? Hypothetical! The Michelle tape rumor was created to affect the very simple minded NeoCons that have no ability to comprehend critical issues that are paramount to the survival of a nation.
Now, let me ask you a few questions. If a President called a Governor, who is a Racist member of the racist CCC, a close and dear friend, would you vote for him? http://www.mississippipolitical.com/housearchive.htm If a President was accused of raping a young black women then that same woman was found mysteriously dead, would you vote for him? http://www.thoughtcrimenews.com/bushrape.htm If a President spoke at a racist University to win white racist support, would you vote for him? http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/feb2000/bush-f08.shtml This should have been the focus of every news outlet in the world but Michelle (wife of Obama) infamous “WHITEY” NO video is?
[Reply]
Isn’t it sad a Socialist web site would tell the truth about our own President before the so called NeoCon American press would. Is our media more socialist than the Republican’s love child, China? Has the NeoCons pushed us towards Chinese type of socialism (X-ing habeas corpus, Google spying on our internet activities,listening in on our cell phone calls,controlling media content,etc.)by using Roverine political antics and lying to the public about war, outing a CIA operative agent, attacking Obama’s wife, Carl Rove being gay.
[Reply]
Why is bad news a “smear campaign”. If it’s true it’s true. And what’s up with Obama’s anti smear web site. He states the “smear” and then says’ “It is a lie”. (eg. Rumor: Obama is a Muslim. Truth: Obama is a Christian.) That’s it??? No proof! Just you say it’s true and it’s true. Like, what about your first 29 years of life? Only turn Christian when you run for office. Then bail on your pastor. Nice guy. Are you going to bail on us when we embarrass you?
[Reply]
Mark, you got a tiny little red dick. Rumor or truth? Please provide photos as evidence of proof.
[Reply]
The Obamas have uttered and written enough RACIST things already… I don’t know why so many people refuse to acknowledge that. They have also managed to surround themselves with racists for years.
The world is laughing at you, America. There must be something in the water! Carry on…
[Reply]